Scholars
Publications
In The News
Events
Research
Explore SAIS
Scholars
In The News
Events
Research
Explore SAIS

The B.I.P.R. site uses cookies and similar technologies.
By clicking the "Accept" button, or continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, including our cookie policy.

Accept
Refuse


BIPR | Why Americans Loved Mussolini
Why Americans Loved Mussolini

February 15, 2021 - 18:30

Katy Hull, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Event Recap

Addressing the title of her recently published book, The Machine Has a Soul, Dr. Hull explained how the image of the machine can be thought of as a metaphor for modern life in the US during the 1920s and 30s. Mechanization interfered with traditional notions of masculinity, the democratic process, and contributed to a major economic crisis. In contrast, the Italian model of Fascism under Mussolini appeared to some to be using updated processes in ways that edified the lived experiences of ordinary people. Dr. Hull identified three main reasons why Fascist sympathies were present in the US during this period: Mussolini’s presentation of masculinity; the Italian corporate state’s apparent ability to provide a solution to inherent problems of democracy; and Fascism’s capacity to offer a path towards economic recovery.

These gender, institutional, and economic dimensions are examined in her book via four interlocking biographies of American sympathizers with Fascism. Hull emphasized that Fascist sympathies were not unique to liberals or conservatives in the US; influential voices on both the right and left spoke out in support of Mussolini’s policies. Mainstream figures in US politics and the media establishment peddled sympathetic views toward Italian fascism, and to a large extent their ideas gelled with broader currents US politics during the 1920s and ’30s.

Hull noted how during times of economic transition and cultural dislocation men develop a sense of imperilled masculinity. The impact of industrialization and the burgeoning consumer-based economy had eroded masculine ideals of autonomy and responsibility. There was a marked shift in discourse of manhood from that of a producer to that of a consumer, and from internal marks of character to external markers of material wealth. Mussolini was seen as a counterweight to this new archetype—driven by internal will, lacking interest in consumption, and purposefully navigating the complexities of modernity without losing a sense of self. In this light, Fascism held a mirror up to the set of conditions that had seemingly destabilized society in the US.

On an institutional level, liberal democracy was increasingly seen to be out of sync with contemporary conditions, and some observers considered citizens to be too busy and distracted to engage in the complexities of modern politics. Introduction of new media was thought of as dangerous, preventing the public from forming intelligent opinions. The Fascist corporate state, then, addressed these concerns by having a plebiscite for a parliament of pre-selected experts. This allowed for mass participation in politics without asking the voters to engage in elite decision making. Hull pointed out that this system was not intended by admirers of Fascism to be directly grafted onto US democracy, but rather functioned as a template to better equip a modern state.

Like many Americans, fascist sympathizers interpreted the Great Depression as a result of over industrialization and demanded new legislation. They believed that Mussolini’s policies achieved a balance between men and machines. The fascist regime promoted policies of land reclamation in Southern Italy. American fascist sympathizers characterized these policies as using high-tech methods to return to the traditional way of life. Imagery of the simple, solid life led by the relocated families was used to try and influence FDR towards subsistence homesteads in the New Deal. The resettlement of Americans away from urban areas was encouraged as a way to recalibrate the economy, using machines as servants rather than masters of men. Hull concluded by highlighting that Mussolini’s Fascism provided a unique and appealing foil to US culture and politics in the 1920s and ’30s. It was regarded by some as a toolbox for policies and institutions that could work to address the crisis of modernization in the US, and therefore sent a reassuring message about the reconciliation of modernity and human life.




Full Audio:
Why Americans Loved Mussolini
American Foreign Policy Series

hosted by Professor John L. Harper

Katy Hull
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

In the 1920s and 1930s, a number of influential Americans sympathized with Mussolini and Italian fascism. They were drawn to fascism due to widespread views about the negative impact of technological change on American democracy, communities, and jobs. This episode in history offers insights into the popular appeal of authoritarian regimes during periods of wrenching economic and social change.

KATY HULL

Dr. Katy Hull is a lecturer in American Studies at the University of Amsterdam.

Her book The Machine Has a Soul: American Sympathy With Italian Fascism, was published this year by Princeton University Press. Hull holds a PhD in US History from Georgetown University (2018), an MA in Human Rights, and an MA in International Relations and International Economics from the Johns Hopkins University SAIS (B'02,05). From 2005 until 2010 she worked for the World Bank in Washington, DC. Hull is interested in twentieth century US history, intellectual history, civil rights, masculinity, development, human rights, and US foreign policy.
Upcoming Events
BOOK PRESENTATION - The Sound of Habsburg: A Musical History of The Austrian Empire
Feb 23
Philipp Ther
Professor of East Central European History, University of Vienna
BOOK PRESENTATION – Warhead: How the Brain Shapes War and War Shapes the Brain
Mar 02
Nicholas Wright
Affiliated Scholar, Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center; Non-Resident Fellow, Cognitive Technology, INSS
Scaling Up Sustainable Finance and Investment in the Global South
Mar 09
Ulrich Volz
Professor of Economics and Director, Centre for Sustainable Finance, SOAS University of London
Gaza: The Dream and the Nightmare
Mar 12
Julie Norman
Associate Professor in Politics and International Relations, University College London (UCL); Director of UCL’s Israel-Palestine Initiative
The Dark Side of the Earth. Is the Cold War Over
Mar 16
Mikhail Zygar
Journalist, Historian, and Bestselling Author



Recent Events
Europe as an International Actor: Power in a Changing Global Order
Feb 16
Daniela Schwarzer
Executive Board Member, Bertelsmann Stiftung; Honorary Professor of Political Science, Frei University, Berlin
Transatlantic Turbulence: What Next For Europe?
Feb 12
Justin O. Frosini
Robert Abernethy Adjunct Professor, SAIS Europe; Director, Center for Constitutional Studies and Democratic Development; Associate Professor of Comparative Public Law, Bocconi University
Transatlantic Relations in the Era of Great Power Competition
Feb 09
Giovanna De Maio
Advisor on Transatlantic Relations, French Policy Planning; Adjunct Professor of US Foreign Policy, SciencesPo Paris
BOOK PRESENTATION - Constitution-Building After the Arab Spring. A Comparative Perspective
Feb 05
Francesco Biagi
Author - Associate Professor, Department of Legal Studies, University of Bologna
The US Intervention in Venezuela One Month Later
Feb 02
Juan José Gómez-Camacho
Senior Fellow at SAIS Europe; Former Mexican Ambassador to Canada, to the United Nations, to the European Union, to Belgium and Luxembourg, to Singapore and to Myanmar and Brunei



About BIPR
SAIS Europe Integration Fund
Research Affiliation
Follow BIPR


© BIPR, all rights reserved - Bologna Institute for Policy Research - via Andreatta 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy