Scholars
Publications
In The News
Events
Research
Explore SAIS
Scholars
In The News
Events
Research
Explore SAIS

The B.I.P.R. site uses cookies and similar technologies.
By clicking the "Accept" button, or continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, including our cookie policy.

Accept
Refuse


BIPR | Why Americans Loved Mussolini
Why Americans Loved Mussolini

February 15, 2021 - 18:30

Katy Hull, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Event Recap

Addressing the title of her recently published book, The Machine Has a Soul, Dr. Hull explained how the image of the machine can be thought of as a metaphor for modern life in the US during the 1920s and 30s. Mechanization interfered with traditional notions of masculinity, the democratic process, and contributed to a major economic crisis. In contrast, the Italian model of Fascism under Mussolini appeared to some to be using updated processes in ways that edified the lived experiences of ordinary people. Dr. Hull identified three main reasons why Fascist sympathies were present in the US during this period: Mussolini’s presentation of masculinity; the Italian corporate state’s apparent ability to provide a solution to inherent problems of democracy; and Fascism’s capacity to offer a path towards economic recovery.

These gender, institutional, and economic dimensions are examined in her book via four interlocking biographies of American sympathizers with Fascism. Hull emphasized that Fascist sympathies were not unique to liberals or conservatives in the US; influential voices on both the right and left spoke out in support of Mussolini’s policies. Mainstream figures in US politics and the media establishment peddled sympathetic views toward Italian fascism, and to a large extent their ideas gelled with broader currents US politics during the 1920s and ’30s.

Hull noted how during times of economic transition and cultural dislocation men develop a sense of imperilled masculinity. The impact of industrialization and the burgeoning consumer-based economy had eroded masculine ideals of autonomy and responsibility. There was a marked shift in discourse of manhood from that of a producer to that of a consumer, and from internal marks of character to external markers of material wealth. Mussolini was seen as a counterweight to this new archetype—driven by internal will, lacking interest in consumption, and purposefully navigating the complexities of modernity without losing a sense of self. In this light, Fascism held a mirror up to the set of conditions that had seemingly destabilized society in the US.

On an institutional level, liberal democracy was increasingly seen to be out of sync with contemporary conditions, and some observers considered citizens to be too busy and distracted to engage in the complexities of modern politics. Introduction of new media was thought of as dangerous, preventing the public from forming intelligent opinions. The Fascist corporate state, then, addressed these concerns by having a plebiscite for a parliament of pre-selected experts. This allowed for mass participation in politics without asking the voters to engage in elite decision making. Hull pointed out that this system was not intended by admirers of Fascism to be directly grafted onto US democracy, but rather functioned as a template to better equip a modern state.

Like many Americans, fascist sympathizers interpreted the Great Depression as a result of over industrialization and demanded new legislation. They believed that Mussolini’s policies achieved a balance between men and machines. The fascist regime promoted policies of land reclamation in Southern Italy. American fascist sympathizers characterized these policies as using high-tech methods to return to the traditional way of life. Imagery of the simple, solid life led by the relocated families was used to try and influence FDR towards subsistence homesteads in the New Deal. The resettlement of Americans away from urban areas was encouraged as a way to recalibrate the economy, using machines as servants rather than masters of men. Hull concluded by highlighting that Mussolini’s Fascism provided a unique and appealing foil to US culture and politics in the 1920s and ’30s. It was regarded by some as a toolbox for policies and institutions that could work to address the crisis of modernization in the US, and therefore sent a reassuring message about the reconciliation of modernity and human life.

Full Audio:

Why Americans Loved Mussolini
American Foreign Policy Series

hosted by Professor John L. Harper

Katy Hull
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

In the 1920s and 1930s, a number of influential Americans sympathized with Mussolini and Italian fascism. They were drawn to fascism due to widespread views about the negative impact of technological change on American democracy, communities, and jobs. This episode in history offers insights into the popular appeal of authoritarian regimes during periods of wrenching economic and social change.

KATY HULL

Dr. Katy Hull is a lecturer in American Studies at the University of Amsterdam.

Her book The Machine Has a Soul: American Sympathy With Italian Fascism, was published this year by Princeton University Press. Hull holds a PhD in US History from Georgetown University (2018), an MA in Human Rights, and an MA in International Relations and International Economics from the Johns Hopkins University SAIS (B'02,05). From 2005 until 2010 she worked for the World Bank in Washington, DC. Hull is interested in twentieth century US history, intellectual history, civil rights, masculinity, development, human rights, and US foreign policy.
Upcoming Events
Has the Paris Climate Agreement Changed Corporate Behavior?
Nov 11
Jeff D. Colgan
Brown University; Climate Solutions Lab
The US Election - Where Does it Leave Europe?
Nov 14
Majda Ruge
European Council on Foreign Relations
Political Representation in the Anthropocene: A History of Environmental Politics
Nov 18
Liesbeth van de Grift
Utrecht University, The Netherland
Sweden, Finland and NATO
Nov 25
Veronika Wand-Danielsson
Swedish Ambassador to Germany
Managing Mineral Wealth. Why Are “Mining Countries” Set to Perform Poorly, But Still Expand Their Mining Sectors?
Dec 02
Monika Weber-Fahr
World Bank’s Global Water Department; Hertie School of Governance



Recent Events
Europe and the 1860 Damascus Events: The 'Responsibility to Protect' in the Imperial Age
Nov 07
Eugene L. Rogan
St Antony's College, Oxford University
The European Union and the Gulf in the Changing World Order
Nov 04
Luigi Di Maio
EU Special Representative for the Gulf Region
Science and Diplomacy
Oct 31
Stéphanie Balme
Centre de Recherches Internationales/Center for International Studies (CERI), Sciences Po Paris/CNRS
World on the Brink: How America Can Beat China in the Race for the Twenty-First Century
Oct 28
Dmitri Alperovitch
Silverado Policy Accelerator; CrowdStrike
Trump, Harris and the Transatlantic Future: A Roundtable in Honor of SAIS Professor David P. Calleo, 1934-2023
Oct 21
Dana H. Allin
Adjunct Professor, SAIS Europe; Editor of Survival; Senior Fellow for Transatlantic Affairs, International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS)



About BIPR
SAIS Europe Integration Fund
Research Affiliation
Follow BIPR


© BIPR, all rights reserved - Bologna Institute for Policy Research - via Andreatta 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy